BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
  • Home
  • Services for You
    • Conveyancing Solicitors
    • Leasehold Solicitors
    • Property Dispute Solicitors
    • Divorce, Family Law and Mediation
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Equity Release Solicitors
    • Retirement Property Conveyancing
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence Solicitors
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Disputes
    • Corporate & Commercial Legal Advice
    • Estate Management Solicitors
  • BLB Solicitors Locations
    • Almondsbury Solicitors
    • Bath Solicitors
    • Bristol Solicitors
    • Bradford on Avon Solicitors
    • Swindon Solicitors
    • Trowbridge Solicitors
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • BLB Solicitors – How we work
    • Making Payments to BLB Solicitors
    • Instructing BLB Solicitors
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
    • Interest Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Home » The relevance of external factors

Medical Negligence
Feb 5th, 2016

At BLB Solicitors, our goal is simple – to deliver you clear, practical legal advice and cost-effective solutions. We hope you enjoy exploring our Blog. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, please do contact us.

The relevance of external factors

In the case of Laughton v Shalaby (2014) the Claimant had a left hip replacement and her surgeon used the “antero-lateral approach” for the operation. This required the surgeon to detach the gluteus medius muscle from the bone so that the prosthesis could be inserted before the muscle was reattached.

Following her surgery the Claimant saw no improvement in her symptoms and during a second operation it was discovered by a different surgeon that the muscle had not been reattached to the bone.

At the trial of the Claimant’s claim it was alleged that the first surgeon had negligently failed to reattach the gluteus medius properly or at all. The Judge considered the expert evidence and preferred the view expressed by the Defendant’s expert that tearing away (avulsion) of the muscle was a recognised, although rare, complication following the surgical approach adopted by the surgeon. Consequently the claim was dismissed.

On appeal, the Claimant submitted that the risk of natural avulsion was so rare that it was statistically insignificant. Instead it was argued that it was more likely that the Defendant had either not reattached the muscle or had failed to do so properly. The Claimant also tried to adduce extraneous evidence about the Defendant’s lack of probity, stress-related problems and incompetence in other cases. The Court of Appeal held that the statistics about the risk of avulsion were not clear cut. It also held that whilst the conditions imposed on the Defendant’s registration to practice and his suspension for assault might have been relevant to his credibility they did not make it more probable that he had performed the Claimant’s operation negligently. There was no medical evidence produced proving stress related problems and evidence of incompetence in other cases was only admissible if relevant to the issue being considered. Consequently the appeal was dismissed.

David Gazzard has dealt with many claims involving negligently performed hip replacements and in particular the “Hardinge approach”. For a confidential discussion, David can be contacted on 01793 615011.

David Gazzard
Request a Call Back

Recent Articles

  • Sodium valproate: the continuing scandal
  • Swindon medical negligence solicitor speaks out over report’s stark findings
  • Promising new test for sepsis wins big award
  • Sepsis compensation claim success
  • Medicines Review, to include Sodium Valproate, is underway

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...
  • Apr 24th, 2018
    MHRA change licence for Sodium Valproate
    Read Article
  • Nov 22nd, 2018
    Sepsis compensation claim success
    Read Article
View All Related Articles
Get in-touch today
Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath Solicitors

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon Solicitors

    01225 866541
  • Swindon Solicitors

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge Solicitors

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2025 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal