BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
  • Home
  • Services for You
    • Conveyancing Solicitors
    • Leasehold Solicitors
    • Property Dispute Solicitors
    • Divorce, Family Law and Mediation
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Equity Release Solicitors
    • Retirement Property Conveyancing
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence Solicitors
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Disputes
    • Corporate & Commercial Legal Advice
    • Estate Management Solicitors
  • BLB Solicitors Locations
    • Almondsbury Solicitors
    • Bath Solicitors
    • Bristol Solicitors
    • Bradford on Avon Solicitors
    • Swindon Solicitors
    • Trowbridge Solicitors
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • BLB Solicitors – How we work
    • Making Payments to BLB Solicitors
    • Instructing BLB Solicitors
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
    • Interest Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Home » Hospital not negligent in the monitoring of premature baby’s breathing

Medical Negligence
May 1st, 2015

At BLB Solicitors, our goal is simple – to deliver you clear, practical legal advice and cost-effective solutions. We hope you enjoy exploring our Blog. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, please do contact us.

Hospital not negligent in the monitoring of premature baby’s breathing

In the case of Aspinall v Secretary of State for Health (2014) allegations were made of negligent hospital care following the premature birth of a baby at 32 weeks.

At 9.55 pm on 8th April 1982 John Apinall (the Claimant) was delivered prematurely by caesarean section at a hospital for which the Defendant had legal responsibility. The Claimant was born in a poor condition and showed no signs of life other than a slow heart rate. He was intubated, successfully resuscitated and transferred to the Special Care Baby Unit. Over a 45 minute period between 11.30 pm on the 8th April and 12.15 am on the 9th April the Claimant deteriorated to a perilous state. It was common ground that his ventilation tube had slipped out of position by 12.15 am. Although the tube was reinserted and the Claimant received intensive care, he developed hyaline membrane disease (a stiffening of the lungs) and at some point suffered a bleed in the brain. The resulting brain injury left him with asymmetric diplegic cerebral palsy, cognitive, behavioural and physical problems, and epilepsy.

The Claimant’s case was that although he had stopped breathing at about 11.30 pm, the attending doctor failed to check or otherwise notice that his chest was not moving in time with the ventilator over the crucial 45 minute period. According to the Claimant’s medical expert, it was probable that the ventilation tube had slipped out of place by 11.30 pm and the Claimant only survived because he received a small amount of oxygen from the displaced tube.

Dismissing the claim, the High Court held that the doctor had not been negligent in treating the Claimant between 11.30 pm and 12.15 am. The theory of the Claimant’s medical expert was no more than speculation. A more likely theory was that the ventilation tube had become dislodged in a non-negligent way nearer to 12.15 am when the doctor checked it for secretions. It was almost inconceivable that the doctor and nurses in the Special Care Unit could have monitored the Claimant over 45 minutes without noticing that his chest was not moving.

The Court concluded that there had been no breach of duty and, in any event, the alleged breach did not cause the very sad outcome.

David Gazzard
Request a Call Back

Recent Articles

  • Sodium valproate: the continuing scandal
  • Swindon medical negligence solicitor speaks out over report’s stark findings
  • Promising new test for sepsis wins big award
  • Sepsis compensation claim success
  • Medicines Review, to include Sodium Valproate, is underway

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...
  • Apr 24th, 2018
    MHRA change licence for Sodium Valproate
    Read Article
  • Nov 22nd, 2018
    Sepsis compensation claim success
    Read Article
View All Related Articles
Get in-touch today
Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath Solicitors

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon Solicitors

    01225 866541
  • Swindon Solicitors

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge Solicitors

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2025 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal