BLB Solicitors
BLB Solicitors
  • Home
  • COVID-19 Hub
  • Services for You
    • Residential Property
    • Leasehold Property Rights
    • Property Dispute Resolution
    • Divorce and Family Law
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Disputes
    • Company & Commercial
    • Estate Management
  • Locations
    • Almondsbury
    • Bath
    • Bristol
    • Bradford on Avon
    • Swindon
    • Trowbridge
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • How we work
    • Making Payments
    • Instructing BLB
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Medical Negligence May 29th, 2015

A decision of life or death

BLB were recently asked for advice by a Muslim family whose elderly relative had suffered a severe stroke and had been hospitalised for 4 months. As a result of the stroke the relative was unable to speak or swallow and had difficulties moving the right side of her body. Following a chest infection compromising her lung function a decision was taken by the clinicians to stop feeding the lady (via her gastric tube), withdraw continued drug therapy and cease routine observations. Having cared for their relative whilst in hospital and due to their religious beliefs the family wanted the hospital to continue treatment so as to prolong her life rather than have her pass away. Fortunately after meeting with the clinicians concerned the family were able to persuade the hospital to review their decision and allow their relative to return home with the benefit of care in the community.

This case is similar in a number of respects to the case of R (on the application of Tracey) v Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust which was heard by the Court of Appeal on the 17th June 2014. This case concerned the issue of consulting patients when taking decisions involving life sustaining treatment (in this case whether to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation or CPR) and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights which requires respect for private and family life. The leading judgment said :-

“A decision as to how to pass the closing days and moments of one’s life and how one manages one’s death touches in the most immediate and obvious way a patient’s personal autonomy, integrity, dignity and quality of life.”

The Court rejected the argument that there is no need to involve the patient if CPR is considered to be futile, it is important for patients to know such an important clinical decision has been made and, further, the patient may want to have a second opinion.

This decision imposes an obligation on clinicians to seek to discuss “Do not attempt CPR” decisions with patients unless to do so would cause the patient physical or psychological harm. Doctors cannot avoid raising the matter with patients just because the doctor thinks the patient would find it distressing.

The Judgment does not directly deal with the position of patients who lack capacity. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires decisions for those who lack capacity to make the decision for themselves to be made in the individual’s best interests. When deciding best interests, a clinician is required to take account “if practicable and appropriate to consult them” the views of anyone, amongst others, engaged in caring for the individual or interested in their welfare. In other words, if clinicians cannot talk to the patient then they should talk to the family. Confidentiality may, occasionally, be an issue but it should not become an artificial barrier to discussion or, even worse, an excuse.

For further advice on this subject contact David Gazzard on 01793 615011.

Image by Deb under a Creative Commons Licence

David Gazzard
Make an Enquiry

Recent Stories

  • Assessing mental capacity during lockdown
  • Deed of Variation: changing a Will after death
  • What is the 7 year rule in Inheritance Tax?
  • Can a right of way be removed?
  • Charitable gifts and Inheritance Tax

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...

  • May 1st, 2015
    GP liable for failure to diagnose bacterial meningitis
    Read Article
  • May 29th, 2015
    Beware chemical burns from skin preparation solutions
    Read Article
View All Related Articles

Get in-touch today

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon

    01225 866541
  • Swindon

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2021 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal