BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • info@blbsolicitors.co.uk
BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • info@blbsolicitors.co.uk
  • Home
  • Services for You
    • Conveyancing Solicitors
    • Leasehold Property Rights
    • Property Dispute Solicitors
    • Divorce, Family Law and Mediation
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence Solicitors
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Dispute Solicitors
    • Corporate & Commercial Legal Advice for Business
    • Estate Management Solicitors
  • BLB Solicitors Locations
    • Almondsbury Solicitors
    • Bath Solicitors
    • Bristol Solicitors
    • Bradford on Avon Solicitors
    • Swindon Solicitors
    • Trowbridge Solicitors
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • BLB Solicitors – How we work
    • Making Payments to BLB Solicitors
    • Instructing BLB Solicitors
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Home » Repeal of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948

Medical Negligence
Mar 1st, 2015

At BLB Solicitors, our goal is simple – to deliver you clear, practical legal advice and cost-effective solutions. We hope you enjoy exploring our Blog. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, please do contact us.

Repeal of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948

The Medical Defence Union (MDU) has recently renewed its proposal that a law dating back to 1948 be repealed. It also wants to see caps imposed on the level of damages awarded for future care.

Section 2(4) of the Act provides that :-

“In an action for damages for personal injuries….there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses the possibility of avoiding those expenses or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the NHS.”

So what would be the consequences of a repeal?

Even if s2(4) of the Act were repealed a Court would still compare the quality of the proposed private provision and the proposed state provision. It would also have to consider to what extent the quality and extent of future state provision could be guaranteed. If a Claimant required 24 hour care within his or her home, what would the NHS provide? Would it provide suitable equipment, nursing care, transport etc? And would it guarantee to do so for the rest of the Claimant’s life?

To repeal the Act would allow any Defendant, including insured motorists, to avoid paying compensation by saying that of course the private provision is disproportionate because the Claimant can get the same provision for free through the NHS. That might lower the compensation awards but it would simply shift the burden from insurers to the state.

The MDU is not “the state” so repeal of the Act would be particularly advantageous to its members if not the taxpayer.

 

Image by SMLP under creative commons

David Gazzard
Request a Call Back

Recent Articles

  • Surgical smoke inhalation: risks for the surgical team
  • Government expected to legalise e-scooters
  • Sodium valproate: the continuing scandal
  • Are you aware of the major new changes to the Highway Code?
  • Swindon medical negligence solicitor speaks out over report’s stark findings

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...
  • Nov 28th, 2018
    Keeping kids first helps minimise fallout from family breakdown
    Read Article
  • Jun 29th, 2019
    Top tips for residential landlords
    Read Article
View All Related Articles
Get in-touch today
Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath Solicitors

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon Solicitors

    01225 866541
  • Swindon Solicitors

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge Solicitors

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2022 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal