BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
BLB Solicitors
  • +01225 755656
  • enquiries@blbsolicitors.co.uk
  • Home
  • Services for You
    • Conveyancing Solicitors
    • Leasehold Solicitors
    • Property Dispute Solicitors
    • Divorce, Family Law and Mediation
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Equity Release Solicitors
    • Retirement Property Conveyancing
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence Solicitors
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Disputes
    • Corporate & Commercial Legal Advice
    • Estate Management Solicitors
  • BLB Solicitors Locations
    • Almondsbury Solicitors
    • Bath Solicitors
    • Bristol Solicitors
    • Bradford on Avon Solicitors
    • Swindon Solicitors
    • Trowbridge Solicitors
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • BLB Solicitors – How we work
    • Making Payments to BLB Solicitors
    • Instructing BLB Solicitors
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
    • Interest Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Home » Court of Appeal considers the effect of failing to serve a Party Wall Notice

Property Dispute Resolution
Semi detached properties with party wall
Mar 4th, 2024

At BLB Solicitors, our goal is simple – to deliver you clear, practical legal advice and cost-effective solutions. We hope you enjoy exploring our Blog. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, please do contact us.

Court of Appeal considers the effect of failing to serve a Party Wall Notice

Oliver ThorpProperty Disputes specialist Oliver Thorp considers the Court of Appeals decision in Power & Kyson v Shah concerning the effect of failing to serve a Party Wall Notice.

Contact Oliver on 01225 462871, or submit the Contact Form below.

Party Wall Notice

In 2023, the Court of Appeal had to decide on a narrow but potentially far-reaching question: if a property owner fails to serve a Party Wall Notice, can the adjoining owner rely on the dispute resolution process contained in the Party Wall Act 1996 (“the Act”)?

Surprisingly, the Court decided they could not!

Discover more about dealing with Party Wall Disputes.

Power & Kyson v Shah: the facts

Mr Shah wanted to carry out some work on his property, including removing a chimney breast. He did not think the Act applied and so did not serve notice on his neighbours, Mr and Mrs Power.

Following the completion of the work, the Powers were concerned their property had been damaged. They instructed a party wall surveyor, purportedly under the dispute resolution procedure contained in Section 10 of the Act. Mr Shah refused to appoint a surveyor, so the Powers’ surveyor (following the Section 10 procedure) appointed one on Mr Shah’s behalf. The surveyors then purported to award Mr and Mrs Power £4,223.49 in compensation for the damage. Continuing to follow the procedure set out in the Act, the Powers attempted to enforce the award in the Magistrates Court.

However, Mr Shah issued a claim in the County Court for a declaration that the Act did not apply. The Court agreed with Mr Shah, so the Powers appealed. The Court of Appeal held that the Section 10 procedure had not been triggered as Mr Shah had not served a Party Wall Notice. Accordingly, the surveyors’ party wall award was null and void.

Comment

The Powers could (and in hindsight should) have issued a claim for damages in the County Court against Mr Shah for trespass and nuisance.

By failing to serve notice, Mr Shah could not avail himself of the rights and protections of the Act, including the right to enter onto neighbouring land. However, Mr Shah’s failure also meant the Powers:

  • were deprived of the ability to seek a party wall award.
  • could not serve an enforcement counter notice requiring Mr Shah to incorporate additional works under Sections 4(1) and 6(3).
  • did not have the benefit of a surveyor assessing the works in advance to ensure they were carried out without damage to their property.

An adjoining owner still has remedies through the court at common law (i.e. injunctions and actions in nuisance and trespass) and for breaches of statutory duty. However, these procedures are likely more costly and time-consuming than the Section 10 dispute resolution procedure under the Act.

If your neighbour commences work without serving notice – and you act promptly – you can apply for an injunction to stop the work from progressing until they comply with the procedure set out in the Act. Serving notice brings the matter back within the remit of the Act and the Section 10 dispute resolution procedure. However, not acting promptly means, like the Powers, losing the Act’s procedures and protection.

Oliver Thorp
Request a Call Back

Recent Articles

  • Compensation for tree root damage
  • Profits à prendre: an introduction
  • Do I need planning permission for a fence?
  • I was promised the house: Can you enforce a verbal promise?
  • Can a right of way be removed?

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...
  • Feb 17th, 2025
    Rights of light explained
    Read Article
  • Mar 3rd, 2025
    I was promised the house: Can you enforce a verbal promise?
    Read Article
View All Related Articles
Get in-touch today
Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath Solicitors

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon Solicitors

    01225 866541
  • Swindon Solicitors

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge Solicitors

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury Solicitors

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2025 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal