BLB Solicitors
BLB Solicitors
  • Home
  • COVID-19 Hub
  • Services for You
    • Residential Property
    • Leasehold Property Rights
    • Property Dispute Resolution
    • Divorce and Family Law
    • Lifetime Planning and Wills
    • Probate and Estate Administration
    • Personal Injury Compensation
    • Medical Negligence
  • Services for Business
    • Commercial Property
    • Commercial Property Disputes
    • Company & Commercial
    • Estate Management
  • Locations
    • Almondsbury
    • Bath
    • Bristol
    • Bradford on Avon
    • Swindon
    • Trowbridge
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Working for BLB
    • How we work
    • Making Payments
    • Instructing BLB
    • Terms of Business
    • Complaints Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
BLB News Feb 15th, 2012

A deathbed marriage

A parent’s remarriage can occasionally give rise to disagreements and hostility within a family. But what if that remarriage leads to the new spouse benefiting under a Will, and the children being disinherited? This was the scenario in the recent case of Wharton v Bancroft and Others [2011] EWHC 3250 which concerned a substantial estate of around £4 million. Mr Wharton had been diagnosed with cancer and was told he did not have long to live. He was discharged from hospital and 6 days later made a new Will leaving everything to his partner of 32 years, to the exclusion of his 3 daughters. Later that day the couple married at home.

After his death the daughters brought a challenge against the Will. They claimed that he did not make his wishes sufficiently clear, he was unable to properly understand the meaning of the Will when it was read back to him and that he had been unduly influenced by his partner. They also originally tried to claim that he lacked the capacity to make the Will but later withdrew this argument. The judge found that, although the deceased had been terminally ill, he had been capable of making and approving the contents of the simple Will that he had made. He held that ascertions previously made to his daughters that he would provide for them were not particularly compelling and had no consistent pattern. His previous Wills were similarly varied and inconsistent.

The Court found that there was no evidence that Mr Wharton had been coerced into making his Will or that undue influence had occurred. The fact that the Solicitor had not got a medical attendant to certify that Mr Wharton had the capacity to make a Will was not an issue in this case, the Solicitor was entitled to rely on his own assessment which had been accepted as correct. Although Mr Wharton was terminally ill, the judge said that he was a capable testator. The Court did express disappointment that the parties had not been able to come to an out of court settlement, which would have been of benefit to all concerned.

Martin Cooper
Make an Enquiry

Recent Stories

  • Stamp Duty holiday: has time already run out?
  • Digital assets: why you should include them in your Will
  • Dilapidations Claims: tips for commercial tenants
  • Assessing mental capacity during lockdown
  • Deed of Variation: changing a Will after death

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Share this article

You may also like...

  • Jan 25th, 2012
    Judicial support for pre-nuptial agreements continues
    Read Article
  • Apr 11th, 2012
    BLB welcomes new joiner to Bath property department
    Read Article
View All Related Articles

Get in-touch today

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending
  • Bristol

    0117 905 5308
  • Bath

    01225 462871
  • Bradford on Avon

    01225 866541
  • Swindon

    01793 615011
  • Trowbridge

    01225 755656
  • Almondsbury

    0117 905 5308
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644)
©2021 BLB Solicitors | Terms | Privacy | Legal